Rent in the City, Buy Farmland, Pay No Tax: The Advice That Raises Your Tax Bill

Rent in the City, Buy Farmland, Pay No Tax: The Advice That Raises Your Tax Bill

Bhaskar Chitnis got the advice at a wedding in Shrirampur, standing near the buffet with a paper plate in one hand. A cousin who had done well in construction told him the thing everyone at that table already believed: stop buying flats in Pune, keep renting, put the money into agricultural land instead. Agricultural income is fully exempt. Land in the village is outside capital gains. You will never pay tax again.

Bhaskar is 41, a QA lead at an IT services firm in Hinjawadi, and rents a two-bedroom in Baner. He went home, bought four acres near Shrirampur over the following two years, and declared the income from it in his return the way his cousin’s accountant told him to.

His tax went up.

Not because he did anything illegal. Not because someone cheated him. His tax went up because of a rule with a boring name that almost nobody at that wedding had heard of, and which does the exact opposite of what the folklore promises.

The rule nobody mentions: agricultural income does not lower your rate, it raises it

Agricultural income is exempt. That part of the folklore is true and has been true for decades. It survived the rewrite of the entire statute: India replaced the Income-tax Act, 1961 with the Income-tax Act, 2025, which came into force on 1 April 2026, and the exemption for agricultural income carried straight across.

What also carried across is partial integration, and this is the part the buffet advice always omits.

Partial integration says: if your net agricultural income is more than ₹5,000, and your non-agricultural income is above the basic exemption limit, then your agricultural income is added to your other income for the purpose of deciding the rate. The agricultural income itself still is not taxed. But it pushes your salary up the slab table, and your salary is then taxed at that higher rate.

Read that again, because it is the whole article. The exemption does not shelter your salary. It re-prices it.

The arithmetic Bhaskar actually ran

The mechanism is easier to trust once you see the shape of it. Take a salaried person on the old regime with taxable salary comfortably into the third slab, and give them net agricultural income of a few lakh rupees a year from land that genuinely produces a crop.

Without the land, tax is computed on salary alone, walking up the slabs in the normal way. With the land, the computation runs twice. First, tax on salary plus farm income combined. Second, tax on the basic exemption limit plus farm income. The difference between those two figures is what you owe.

The net effect is that the slabs your salary passes through are chosen as though you earned far more than your salary. The farm income escapes tax on itself and hands the bill to your salary. For a person whose salary already sits near the top of a slab, adding exempt farm income can push the marginal portion of that salary into the next band entirely.

This is not a loophole being closed. It is the design. Partial integration exists precisely so that a taxpayer with substantial agricultural income does not get their non-agricultural income taxed at a low slab rate merely because part of their total income is exempt.

The half of the strategy that is real, and much narrower than advertised

There is a genuine tax advantage in agricultural land, and it is worth stating precisely because the precision is what the folklore destroys.

Rural agricultural land is not a capital asset. Because the statutory definition of a capital asset excludes it, selling it does not produce a capital gain to tax. That is real, and it is large.

But “rural” is a defined term, not a vibe. Land qualifies by reference to the population of the local municipality and its distance from municipal limits, with graded distance bands. Land inside a municipality of meaningful population, or within the specified distance of one, is urban agricultural land, and urban agricultural land is a capital asset. Selling it is taxed like any other property.

This is exactly backwards from how people buy. The land everybody wants is on the expanding edge of a city, because that is where the price rises. That is precisely the land most likely to fail the rural test. The land that reliably passes the rural test is far from the city, which is also the land whose price does very little for a very long time.

Notice also what this benefit is and is not. It is a benefit on the disposal of an asset. It is not a shelter for your salary. Nothing about owning farmland makes your Hinjawadi income disappear.

The part that stops most readers before any of this matters

In several states you cannot legally buy agricultural land at all unless you are already an agriculturist.

Karnataka removed that barrier in 2020, when the Land Reforms (Amendment) Act omitted the sections that had restricted purchases to agriculturists and had barred buyers whose non-agricultural income exceeded a ceiling. Any Indian citizen can now buy farmland there.

Other states did not follow. Maharashtra, Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh continue to restrict purchase, in various forms, to agriculturists or those with an agricultural background. Himachal Pradesh does not flatly prohibit it, but regulates it: a non-agriculturist must apply, state the purpose, and wait for a government decision.

Bhaskar is in Maharashtra. The single most consequential fact about his plan was a state land law, not the Income-tax Act. Everyone at the wedding was discussing exemptions. Nobody mentioned whether he was allowed to buy.

The other half quietly died, and almost nobody noticed

“Rent in the city” was never really a tax strategy on its own. It was a strategy that rested on the House Rent Allowance exemption, and HRA lives only in the old regime.

The new regime is now the default. You get HRA only if you actively opt out of the default and into the old one, and only if you then come out ahead despite giving up the new regime’s lower slab structure. A great many salaried people are now on the default, paying rent, and receiving no tax benefit from it whatsoever — while still repeating the advice that renting is the tax-efficient choice.

There is a real change in the opposite direction worth knowing: the Income-tax Rules notified to operationalise the 2025 Act expanded the list of cities qualifying for the higher 50% HRA computation, adding Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune and Ahmedabad to the four long-standing metros, with effect from FY 2026-27. Bhaskar’s city moved into the higher band the same year he stopped being able to use it, because he had drifted onto the default regime and never checked.

And the paperwork tightened. Form 12BB has been replaced by Form 124 from 1 April 2026, which now requires the employee to disclose their relationship with the landlord. The single most common domestic tax fiction in India — rent paid to a parent who owns the flat you grew up in — now has a box on the form asking you to name it.

Why “just declare some farm income” is not a plan

The reason this folklore is so persistent is that for years it was weakly policed. That is documented, by the government, in unusual detail.

The Comptroller and Auditor General examined scrutiny assessments involving agricultural income claims above ₹5 lakh and found that in a substantial share of the sampled cases the exemption had been allowed without verification of land records, receipts or expenses. The audit called the system porous and open to misuse. The CBDT response was to direct assessing officers to independently verify documentary evidence — land records, input costs such as fertiliser and labour, and sale receipts from buyers — before allowing the exemption.

So the honest summary is this: the gap was real, it was measured by the national auditor, and the response was to close it. Building a plan on a hole that a public audit has already named is not tax planning. Declaring agricultural income you did not earn is not avoidance; it is evasion, and it is the thing the verification drive was designed to catch.

What to actually do

If you want farmland because you want farmland — because you will use it, or your family is there, or you want the land itself — that is a real reason and this article has no argument with it.

If you want it as a tax structure, check three things in this order. First, whether your state permits you to buy at all. Second, whether the specific parcel passes the rural test on population and distance, because that single line decides whether a future sale is outside capital gains or squarely inside it. Third, run your own tax with and without the farm income, because partial integration means the answer can move against you.

And before any of it, settle the boring question you can answer this evening: which regime you should be on, and whether the rent you already pay is doing anything for you at all.

What this does not mean

This is not an argument that agricultural land is a bad asset. It is an argument that it is a bad tax shelter for salary, which is a different claim.

The exemption for genuine agricultural income is real and long-standing. The exclusion of rural agricultural land from the definition of a capital asset is real and can be very valuable on a sale. A rollover relief also exists for gains on agricultural land reinvested in agricultural land, for those who genuinely farm and genuinely replace the parcel.

Nor is this a claim that renting is wrong. Renting is often the better financial decision in an expensive city for reasons that have nothing to do with tax. The narrow point is that the tax case for renting now depends entirely on a regime choice most people never consciously made.

What is false is the sentence Bhaskar was handed at the buffet: that this combination is how you stop paying tax. There is no legal arrangement in which a salaried person’s salary stops being taxed because they own land. The exemption applies to agricultural income, and partial integration ensures that even that exemption is not free.

Frequently asked questions

Does buying agricultural land reduce the tax on my salary?

No. The exemption applies to agricultural income, not to your salary. If your net agricultural income exceeds ₹5,000 and your other income is above the basic exemption limit, partial integration adds the farm income to your other income to select the rate, which generally increases the tax on your salary rather than reducing it.

Is the sale of agricultural land always tax-free?

No. Only rural agricultural land falls outside the definition of a capital asset. Whether a parcel is rural is decided by the population of the local municipality and the parcel’s distance from municipal limits. Urban agricultural land is a capital asset and its sale is taxed. Land on a city’s growing edge, which is what most buyers want, is the most likely to fail the rural test.

Can I buy agricultural land if I am a salaried professional?

It depends on the state, and this is often the binding constraint. Karnataka removed the agriculturist requirement in 2020. Maharashtra, Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh continue to restrict purchases, in different ways, to agriculturists or those with an agricultural background, with Himachal Pradesh requiring a government decision on an application rather than banning it outright.

Can I still claim HRA on the rent I pay?

Only under the old regime. The new regime is the default and does not allow the HRA exemption, so many salaried renters currently receive no tax benefit from their rent. From FY 2026-27 the list of cities eligible for the higher 50% computation was expanded to include Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune and Ahmedabad, but that only helps if you are on the old regime in the first place.

What happens if I declare agricultural income I did not really earn?

That is evasion, not planning. The Comptroller and Auditor General found that exemptions had been allowed in many sampled cases without verification of land records, receipts or expenses, and the CBDT subsequently directed assessing officers to verify land records, input expenses and sale receipts before allowing the exemption. The verification gap that made this folklore plausible is the specific thing that has been tightened.

Statutory sources: the Income-tax Act, 2025 as amended, published by the Income Tax Department, is the operative statute from 1 April 2026 and carries the agricultural income exemption, partial integration and the capital asset definition. The audit findings on unverified agricultural income claims are the Comptroller and Auditor General’s, in Chapter V of Report No. 9 of 2019. The framing of the three gates, the ordering that puts state land law ahead of the Income-tax Act, and the observation that the rural test penalises exactly the land buyers want most, are this article’s own.

---

Disclaimer: General information, not financial or legal advice. “Bhaskar Chitnis” is a composite character, not a real individual. Tax rates, thresholds, city classifications and state land laws change, and agricultural land purchase rules differ substantially between states — verify the current position for your state and your parcel, and take professional advice, before acting.